This weekend, a couple of my sisters and I had a short conversation about the Voter ID Amendment on the ballot in Minnesota. Instantly, we were silenced by my brothers. "I make a motion to not discuss politics!" And someone seconded it, so I shut up. But I'm not going to lie, I didn't do so happily. I stewed about it for awhile, and I'm still kind of mad.
It's often said that we shouldn't discuss politics and religion. I often say that those two subjects might be the most important subjects of all (in addition, I think a world without them is boring. It's when I've been most deeply challenged that I've learned the most.). And I'm sure there are situations where it's not appropriate, but among a couple sisters, who want to discuss it, five days before a national election? Yeah. That's appropriate.
I admit that I took their muzzling personally. How can I not? Out of this family of eleven, I am the only one who is political. I am most certainly the only Democrat. And frankly, it's not easy. One brother actually said he didn't want to stand by "the Democrat" in our family picture. A joke? Not funny. Sometimes I wonder how it could be, that I'm the only one among 20 adults with these worldviews. I genuinely think that I'm respectful when I talk about the things I care about. Are you really so offended if I share my perspective? Or do you just find it boring? What do you think is going to happen if we spend half an hour talking about politics? I think we might just have an interesting conversation.
In my house, we will discuss politics. We might not agree, and we might have passionate debates. But we're going to be informed, and we're going to be involved. We're going to talk -- nothing will be offlimits. I want my kids to not only understand the issues, but understand how to make their point, and how to discuss the merits of their argument. Intelligent people can disagree. And they can have a conversation that includes current events, and politics, and religion. Because at the end of the day, those are the things that matter most -- our convictions and our beliefs. In my house, I will not be silenced, nor will anyone who wants to talk. Come on over.
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Separation of Church and State
In an online conversation a few months ago, when she felt like she had me against the wall she laid a trap: "Don't you want a Christian president?!"
I've been mulling that over. And I can't decide if you will attack me for this position or not. Maybe you know me well enough by now. The good thing? I know myself well enough. I feel really comfortable with the hard questions, and after a lot of deliberation, this one is no different.
Do I want a Christian president?
Meh. Not important, really. Look. The past 44 presidents have been Christians (I think?). In our history, we've had plenty of presidential scandal, right? Wars that were based on greed. Marital infidelity. Stealing land and natural resources from people just because we could. Because they had something -- land, resources, that we wanted. Authorization to occupy countries to protect "our" investment in oil, and diamonds, and other valuable resources. We've had presidents who were married, and single, and divorced.
Here's the thing -- while I am a very proud follower of Jesus' teachings, I don't think that Christians have a monopoly on morality. The longer I live and the more people I meet, the more I realize that we're all basically the same. We're mostly inherently good. My friend Beth, an atheist, is one of the most generous and accepting people I know. I have friends who are Jewish, and Muslim, and Buddhist. I have friends of many sects of Christianity. And mostly, they're good. And the ones that aren't as kind, well, some of those folks are Christians too.
I want the president to be honest. And kind. And care more for The People than him or herself. I want the president to place value in hard work and education and caring for the less fortunate. I want him or her to place less importance on a dollar, and more importance on humanity. I want the president to love peace, and reject evil. And choose diplomacy first.
And wherever they draw their sense of right and wrong from, I pray that they are wise and good. That's what's important to me.
I've been mulling that over. And I can't decide if you will attack me for this position or not. Maybe you know me well enough by now. The good thing? I know myself well enough. I feel really comfortable with the hard questions, and after a lot of deliberation, this one is no different.
Do I want a Christian president?
Meh. Not important, really. Look. The past 44 presidents have been Christians (I think?). In our history, we've had plenty of presidential scandal, right? Wars that were based on greed. Marital infidelity. Stealing land and natural resources from people just because we could. Because they had something -- land, resources, that we wanted. Authorization to occupy countries to protect "our" investment in oil, and diamonds, and other valuable resources. We've had presidents who were married, and single, and divorced.
Here's the thing -- while I am a very proud follower of Jesus' teachings, I don't think that Christians have a monopoly on morality. The longer I live and the more people I meet, the more I realize that we're all basically the same. We're mostly inherently good. My friend Beth, an atheist, is one of the most generous and accepting people I know. I have friends who are Jewish, and Muslim, and Buddhist. I have friends of many sects of Christianity. And mostly, they're good. And the ones that aren't as kind, well, some of those folks are Christians too.
I want the president to be honest. And kind. And care more for The People than him or herself. I want the president to place value in hard work and education and caring for the less fortunate. I want him or her to place less importance on a dollar, and more importance on humanity. I want the president to love peace, and reject evil. And choose diplomacy first.
And wherever they draw their sense of right and wrong from, I pray that they are wise and good. That's what's important to me.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Political Party
It's a Political Party up in here. Hang out, or don't. I have a lot to say in the next few weeks. Not to change your vote, necessarily, but to share with you some of my thoughts/feelings/concerns, and to record what's going on in political history so I can look back and see how things changed throughout my lifetime. My blog, my geeky rules. My football season. God bless America.
Money in Politics
If you ask me what the biggest problem in our political system is (and there are many, of course), I would tell you that there is too much money. Too much money in the election process and too much money in the legislative process. Special interest groups spend a ridiculous amount of money to lobby Congress to get their bills passed, or our bills shut down. Corporations spend money on politicians' campaigns and then, in turn, those politicians pass the kind of legislation promoted by said corporation or special interest group. And then, in another kind turn, that company hires the politician after their time in office and gives them a great salary and wonderful benefits package. Win/win/win. For everyone but you and me.
There is a lot of focus on voter suppression (voter ID) this election season. I've yet to see a report where election fraud is an actual problem. Someone told me that there was a gentleman who got caught voting four times. Let me say this: 1. He got caught. 2. Four misvotes does not a national crisis make. We have actual issues to solve; this is a complete waste of our energy.
Do you know that our electronic voting machines are corporately-owned? Right. They're not even owned by us, the taxpaying citizen. Tonight, I saw a story that alleges Tagg Romney (Mitt's son) is part investor in a company that owns a block of voting machines in swing states. Fishy? You tell me.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I'm not making this up (and don't automatically assume I'm wrong because I'm a liberal. I have many conservative/libertarian friends who understand this issue well and who absolutely agree with me). We don't even own our own voting machines. Because that wouldn't turn a profit...heaven forbid.
This past year, the United States Supreme Court basically said that the government cannot limit the spending by special interest groups in the election process (Citizens United). Brilliant. Money buys advertising, and advertising works. We're very gullible people, programmed to believe what we see and hear at face value, partly because we're lazy, partly because we're fearful of the truth, and frankly, partly because we have access to so much information...it's simply too hard to wade through.
I believe in a democracy as it was intended. I want my voice to be equal to the voice of each and every American citizen. I want to discuss the merits of a particular piece of legislation without worrying that it's being purchased and paid for by someone who has no interest in the welfare of America, but in the welfare of the almighty profit. Once again, it's my humble and very resolute opinion that the bottom line is not the only way to measure success.
If you are even the slightest bit intrigued by my position on this (even if you think I'm blowing smoke), I suggest you look into it. At the risk of being an alarmist, I'll say this: The only way we're going to change what's happening here is by getting involved. And we need to do it now, before it's too late. Let not our democracy be for sale.
There is a lot of focus on voter suppression (voter ID) this election season. I've yet to see a report where election fraud is an actual problem. Someone told me that there was a gentleman who got caught voting four times. Let me say this: 1. He got caught. 2. Four misvotes does not a national crisis make. We have actual issues to solve; this is a complete waste of our energy.
Do you know that our electronic voting machines are corporately-owned? Right. They're not even owned by us, the taxpaying citizen. Tonight, I saw a story that alleges Tagg Romney (Mitt's son) is part investor in a company that owns a block of voting machines in swing states. Fishy? You tell me.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I'm not making this up (and don't automatically assume I'm wrong because I'm a liberal. I have many conservative/libertarian friends who understand this issue well and who absolutely agree with me). We don't even own our own voting machines. Because that wouldn't turn a profit...heaven forbid.
This past year, the United States Supreme Court basically said that the government cannot limit the spending by special interest groups in the election process (Citizens United). Brilliant. Money buys advertising, and advertising works. We're very gullible people, programmed to believe what we see and hear at face value, partly because we're lazy, partly because we're fearful of the truth, and frankly, partly because we have access to so much information...it's simply too hard to wade through.
I believe in a democracy as it was intended. I want my voice to be equal to the voice of each and every American citizen. I want to discuss the merits of a particular piece of legislation without worrying that it's being purchased and paid for by someone who has no interest in the welfare of America, but in the welfare of the almighty profit. Once again, it's my humble and very resolute opinion that the bottom line is not the only way to measure success.
If you are even the slightest bit intrigued by my position on this (even if you think I'm blowing smoke), I suggest you look into it. At the risk of being an alarmist, I'll say this: The only way we're going to change what's happening here is by getting involved. And we need to do it now, before it's too late. Let not our democracy be for sale.
Friday, October 19, 2012
Social Services
Among the discussions I have with my other political friends (and those who aren't), frequently the conversation steers to social services. And recently, I think I actually lost a friend who disagrees with me (man, I hope that's not true). But there are some things that don't have a "right" or "wrong" answer, just different philosophies. Allow me to share mine.
I realize that our experiences largely shape our political opinions. So it's no surprise that my friend, whose mom has repeatedly "abused" the system by taking everything the government was willing to give her, has the opinion that "welfare" is a system we cannot afford, and should do away with.
My experiences are with people who, by almost no fault of their own, do not have access to healthcare or income, or have served their country and are dealing with some kind of disability. Do I know people who take advantage of "the system?" Sure. But they are less in number than those I know who legitimately need the help of the government. Some examples:
A man who worked his whole life by the rules, paid income, property, and sales tax. Now is sick and cannot work.
A woman whose husband works three part-time jobs, none of which offers health insurance to their employees. One of her children has chronic illness and needs care.
A man who has lost his job because of outsourcing, and his children are hungry more often than they're not.
My philosophy is this: A government should have a vested interest in the welfare of its citizens. A nation of educated and healthy children will be stronger and more prosperous.
The argument is that we can't afford it. My question: Can we afford not to?
The argument is that we won't help people by giving handouts. My argument is that its hard to pull yourself up by your bootstraps if you haven't boots to begin with.
The argument is that its not the government's job to take care of people. My question: Then whose? (Please do not say The Church. Or The Community. If those were effective, we wouldn't be having this conversation at all.)
I learned recently that Michigan has a great program for kids who are uninsured or underinsured. You can purchase a plan through the State for a nominal fee that covers treatments that your normal plan might not. People can take advantage of this plan so that their kids get the medications and treatments they need to be well, and takes so much stress of families who are dealing the stress of having a sick kid. Brilliant. This, my friends, is what is basically a public option, and something I have long supported as a federal solution to a very serious health insurance industry issue. How great would it be if my little friend Kendall's parents didn't have to struggle and fight with their insurance company for a medication that Kendall needed to be healthy. See that story here. How wonderful it would be if families didn't have to go bankrupt just because they were given a child with chronic illness? I wish we all had that option.
There is no right or wrong here, just philosophical differences. And watching people suffer brings me so much sadness, that I feel compelled to share mine with you. We can care for our people. We must.
I realize that our experiences largely shape our political opinions. So it's no surprise that my friend, whose mom has repeatedly "abused" the system by taking everything the government was willing to give her, has the opinion that "welfare" is a system we cannot afford, and should do away with.
My experiences are with people who, by almost no fault of their own, do not have access to healthcare or income, or have served their country and are dealing with some kind of disability. Do I know people who take advantage of "the system?" Sure. But they are less in number than those I know who legitimately need the help of the government. Some examples:
A man who worked his whole life by the rules, paid income, property, and sales tax. Now is sick and cannot work.
A woman whose husband works three part-time jobs, none of which offers health insurance to their employees. One of her children has chronic illness and needs care.
A man who has lost his job because of outsourcing, and his children are hungry more often than they're not.
My philosophy is this: A government should have a vested interest in the welfare of its citizens. A nation of educated and healthy children will be stronger and more prosperous.
The argument is that we can't afford it. My question: Can we afford not to?
The argument is that we won't help people by giving handouts. My argument is that its hard to pull yourself up by your bootstraps if you haven't boots to begin with.
The argument is that its not the government's job to take care of people. My question: Then whose? (Please do not say The Church. Or The Community. If those were effective, we wouldn't be having this conversation at all.)
I learned recently that Michigan has a great program for kids who are uninsured or underinsured. You can purchase a plan through the State for a nominal fee that covers treatments that your normal plan might not. People can take advantage of this plan so that their kids get the medications and treatments they need to be well, and takes so much stress of families who are dealing the stress of having a sick kid. Brilliant. This, my friends, is what is basically a public option, and something I have long supported as a federal solution to a very serious health insurance industry issue. How great would it be if my little friend Kendall's parents didn't have to struggle and fight with their insurance company for a medication that Kendall needed to be healthy. See that story here. How wonderful it would be if families didn't have to go bankrupt just because they were given a child with chronic illness? I wish we all had that option.
There is no right or wrong here, just philosophical differences. And watching people suffer brings me so much sadness, that I feel compelled to share mine with you. We can care for our people. We must.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Election 2012: Paul Ryan
Is the only way to measure success the bottom line?
You will never hear me say that the budget doesn't matter. That we don't have to be careful in our spending. That we can keep increasing debt with no consequence. I do not idealogically believe that.
But a nation cannot be run like a corporation. We don't measure success only by whether or not we have debt. What good is a balanced budget if are sick? If our children are not properly educated? If our streets and infrastructure is in serious disrepair? What good is a balanced military budget if our soldiers are not cared for when they get home? How will we continue to recruit men and women to serve us? How will we compete globally with children who cannot get a world-class education?
The Tea Party movement in this country is led on the idea that government spending is out of control, and I'm not going to outright disagree. But we have to be careful where we make cuts.
This past spring, Paul Ryan proposed a dramatic budget plan which he calls the Plan to Prosperity. It balances the budget...in 2040. It includes very dramatic cuts to many social programs, including Medicare. It suggests that we should eliminate or drastically reduce funding for federal programs like pell grants, the department of education, veterans benefits, the FDA, FAA, and FBI. I wonder if people can imagine what our world without those would look like? Or is the hesitation just me?
Additionally, the Ryan Budget proposes eliminating Medicare and giving seniors a voucher to purchase private insurance. I cannot imagine the nightmare of this situation. We must care for our elderly, especially since they've been contributing to this program for all of their working life.
Luckily for the wealthy, the Path to Prosperity continues to provide large tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans. So that's good. *eyeroll*
So, as we enter this election season officially, I encourage you to really get to know Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. Paul Ryan will stand out because BELIEVES in his plan, and there is something to be said for conviction. (Romney, on the other hand, has little. He has had many positions on many issues over the years and will happily point you to some of them if you're interested.)
So I'll happily discuss whether or not he's handsome. What kind of hair product he uses, or if there are shirtless photos of him somewhere on the world wide web. But I'll also ask you understand his positions. There is alot at stake here, and we're all smart enough to know that substance matters. And that the bottom line really might not be the only way to measure success.
Oh. And a gift for you: the link to the Ryan budget. Enjoy.
You will never hear me say that the budget doesn't matter. That we don't have to be careful in our spending. That we can keep increasing debt with no consequence. I do not idealogically believe that.
But a nation cannot be run like a corporation. We don't measure success only by whether or not we have debt. What good is a balanced budget if are sick? If our children are not properly educated? If our streets and infrastructure is in serious disrepair? What good is a balanced military budget if our soldiers are not cared for when they get home? How will we continue to recruit men and women to serve us? How will we compete globally with children who cannot get a world-class education?
The Tea Party movement in this country is led on the idea that government spending is out of control, and I'm not going to outright disagree. But we have to be careful where we make cuts.
This past spring, Paul Ryan proposed a dramatic budget plan which he calls the Plan to Prosperity. It balances the budget...in 2040. It includes very dramatic cuts to many social programs, including Medicare. It suggests that we should eliminate or drastically reduce funding for federal programs like pell grants, the department of education, veterans benefits, the FDA, FAA, and FBI. I wonder if people can imagine what our world without those would look like? Or is the hesitation just me?
Additionally, the Ryan Budget proposes eliminating Medicare and giving seniors a voucher to purchase private insurance. I cannot imagine the nightmare of this situation. We must care for our elderly, especially since they've been contributing to this program for all of their working life.
Luckily for the wealthy, the Path to Prosperity continues to provide large tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans. So that's good. *eyeroll*
So, as we enter this election season officially, I encourage you to really get to know Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. Paul Ryan will stand out because BELIEVES in his plan, and there is something to be said for conviction. (Romney, on the other hand, has little. He has had many positions on many issues over the years and will happily point you to some of them if you're interested.)
For Shannon. Man, he's hot.
So I'll happily discuss whether or not he's handsome. What kind of hair product he uses, or if there are shirtless photos of him somewhere on the world wide web. But I'll also ask you understand his positions. There is alot at stake here, and we're all smart enough to know that substance matters. And that the bottom line really might not be the only way to measure success.
Oh. And a gift for you: the link to the Ryan budget. Enjoy.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Politics 2012
Just to get you prepared, here are some things I care about politically right now.
1. Mitt Romney
2. Women's health care
3. Supreme Court's review of the Affordable Health Care Act
4. Paul Ryan's Budget
5. The Walker Recall
6. Saving the United States Postal Service
Here are some things I could not care less about:
1. Ann Romney (unless she has a specific public policy opinion)
2. The proposed Vikings stadium (except that it's taking up too much time/energy in the legislature)
1. Mitt Romney
2. Women's health care
3. Supreme Court's review of the Affordable Health Care Act
4. Paul Ryan's Budget
5. The Walker Recall
6. Saving the United States Postal Service
Here are some things I could not care less about:
1. Ann Romney (unless she has a specific public policy opinion)
2. The proposed Vikings stadium (except that it's taking up too much time/energy in the legislature)
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
May
Heaven help us, May is going to be a big month around here.
1. I'm going to participate in a photography challenge.
2. I'm going to start talking about the 2012 presidential race. It's just over six months until November 6. Also, it appears the Republicans have a nominee. I'm going to share some of my opinions. It's been a long four years since we did this last and I am psyched. This is my football season, y'all. I wish there were Presidential Picks. I feel like gambling. Heh.
Both of those are going to be good reasons to stick around Bits and Pieces. Please don't leave. And please leave your name if you comment. Remember last time...? Oooh. Get ready.
Here are the photography challenge categories. Play with me!
1. Bokeh
2. Movement
3. Strangers
4. Street
5. Soft
6. Reflection
7. My Shadow
8. Silhouette
9. All Alone
10. What Makes Me Smile
11. Bold
12. Emotion
13.Beauty
14. Sunflare
15. Texture
16. Rule of Thirds
17. Hands
18. Water
19. Sign
20. Inequality
21. Contrast
22. Diptych or Triptych
23. Mother Nature
24. Simplicity
25. Weathered
26. After Dark
27. Shallow Depth of Field
28. Strange
29. Vintage
30. Broken
31. Trust
1. I'm going to participate in a photography challenge.
2. I'm going to start talking about the 2012 presidential race. It's just over six months until November 6. Also, it appears the Republicans have a nominee. I'm going to share some of my opinions. It's been a long four years since we did this last and I am psyched. This is my football season, y'all. I wish there were Presidential Picks. I feel like gambling. Heh.
Both of those are going to be good reasons to stick around Bits and Pieces. Please don't leave. And please leave your name if you comment. Remember last time...? Oooh. Get ready.
Here are the photography challenge categories. Play with me!
1. Bokeh
2. Movement
3. Strangers
4. Street
5. Soft
6. Reflection
7. My Shadow
8. Silhouette
9. All Alone
10. What Makes Me Smile
11. Bold
12. Emotion
13.Beauty
14. Sunflare
15. Texture
16. Rule of Thirds
17. Hands
18. Water
19. Sign
20. Inequality
21. Contrast
22. Diptych or Triptych
23. Mother Nature
24. Simplicity
25. Weathered
26. After Dark
27. Shallow Depth of Field
28. Strange
29. Vintage
30. Broken
31. Trust
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Occupy Wallstreet
Do you miss my political blog posts? Me too. I've been silent, but I'm not sure why. Partly because I don't want anyone to dislike me for my worldviews. Partly because the biggest thing going on right now is Occupy Wallstreet and people are downright mean about this protest. Even reasonable people who are generally kind, are rude and unwilling to look past the people who are causing trouble to see that there is an actual movement here. But in the last three days, two people have sparked conversations with me regarding this current event, so I thought I'd tell you how I feel.
I think people are going a little crazy. It's been five years now since the market started to fall. In that time, people started to lose their jobs, their retirements, their homes. If they've been lucky enough to hold their jobs, their pay hasn't increased and their costs of benefits have skyrocketed (see: health insurance premiums). They are struggling, and they are frustrated. There is a group of people who are experiencing an opposite phenomenon, however. The bankers and the CEOs of major corporations are taking home record bonuses. In the hardest economic times since the great depression. Our government continues to protect them and their tax loopholes, because -- in theory -- they're creating jobs. We've actually labeled them "Job Creators." But the people in the first group I mentioned...well, they're not seeing those jobs. So they're not mad at people for being rich, but they're mad at the disparity between the situation of those thriving financially and the majority of the people who are struggling financially, and who are hurting.
Occupy Wallstreet (OWS) isn't sponsored or promoted by anyone. No big corporation or corporately-funded group is building smooth websites and putting out the OWS message. There is no group of billionaires behind it. Therefore, the message hasn't been clearly distributed. But that doesn't mean that it's not legitimate. It just means you're going to have to dig a little deeper to find it.
Increasingly, corporations and politicians are in bed together. The corporations pay politicians to protect their interests by way of funding their campaigns, and then the politicians make policy that does just that. They have to, so they get money for their next campaign. And the cycle continues. And I think people are sick of it. I think they're becoming aware that the corporate voices are more powerful than the peoples'. And know what? That's not democracy. That's a corporate oligarchy. I think that most Americans, right and left, liberal and conservative, are interested in preserving the democracy as laid out by the Constitution.
Therefore, I do not understand the anger against the protestors. I don't understand why we don't support not only their right to assembly, but their message. I don't understand why we can't all get behind what is happening here.
The very best part of this movement, in my opinion, is that people are involved. Probably the best way to make a difference, and promote good change, is invested citizens. Tea Party, OWS, doesn't matter. Be informed. Learn the issues. I think we'll find that we actually agree on some of this.
One friend posted this article today. It's written by a conservative blogger (columnist?) in the UK. They have a big battle going on over there, not completely different from the OWS movement in the US. They're calling it an extension of ours, but the conservative legislature in the UK is trying to take away many rights of the people in the name of budget reduction. They're as frustrated as Americans are. But this author said basically the same thing I've been saying: I think we actually all agree on much of this. We'll make more progress united.
So there. That's my political opinion du jour. You're welcome to comment here or by email or on the phone or come on over. I'll pour you something to drink and make you something to eat. And between us, we'll solve this thing. And I'll convince you that you don't actually have to delete me from your friend list this time.
I think people are going a little crazy. It's been five years now since the market started to fall. In that time, people started to lose their jobs, their retirements, their homes. If they've been lucky enough to hold their jobs, their pay hasn't increased and their costs of benefits have skyrocketed (see: health insurance premiums). They are struggling, and they are frustrated. There is a group of people who are experiencing an opposite phenomenon, however. The bankers and the CEOs of major corporations are taking home record bonuses. In the hardest economic times since the great depression. Our government continues to protect them and their tax loopholes, because -- in theory -- they're creating jobs. We've actually labeled them "Job Creators." But the people in the first group I mentioned...well, they're not seeing those jobs. So they're not mad at people for being rich, but they're mad at the disparity between the situation of those thriving financially and the majority of the people who are struggling financially, and who are hurting.
Occupy Wallstreet (OWS) isn't sponsored or promoted by anyone. No big corporation or corporately-funded group is building smooth websites and putting out the OWS message. There is no group of billionaires behind it. Therefore, the message hasn't been clearly distributed. But that doesn't mean that it's not legitimate. It just means you're going to have to dig a little deeper to find it.
Increasingly, corporations and politicians are in bed together. The corporations pay politicians to protect their interests by way of funding their campaigns, and then the politicians make policy that does just that. They have to, so they get money for their next campaign. And the cycle continues. And I think people are sick of it. I think they're becoming aware that the corporate voices are more powerful than the peoples'. And know what? That's not democracy. That's a corporate oligarchy. I think that most Americans, right and left, liberal and conservative, are interested in preserving the democracy as laid out by the Constitution.
Therefore, I do not understand the anger against the protestors. I don't understand why we don't support not only their right to assembly, but their message. I don't understand why we can't all get behind what is happening here.
The very best part of this movement, in my opinion, is that people are involved. Probably the best way to make a difference, and promote good change, is invested citizens. Tea Party, OWS, doesn't matter. Be informed. Learn the issues. I think we'll find that we actually agree on some of this.
One friend posted this article today. It's written by a conservative blogger (columnist?) in the UK. They have a big battle going on over there, not completely different from the OWS movement in the US. They're calling it an extension of ours, but the conservative legislature in the UK is trying to take away many rights of the people in the name of budget reduction. They're as frustrated as Americans are. But this author said basically the same thing I've been saying: I think we actually all agree on much of this. We'll make more progress united.
So there. That's my political opinion du jour. You're welcome to comment here or by email or on the phone or come on over. I'll pour you something to drink and make you something to eat. And between us, we'll solve this thing. And I'll convince you that you don't actually have to delete me from your friend list this time.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
(Someone other than) Ted and Me on a Tuesday...
It has come to my attention that this not was NOT written by Ted Nugent. I should have checked my sources, first, and I apologize for that. Regardless, the opinions of (someone other than Ted Nugent) are prevalent, and my comments don't change, regardless of the author. Thanks, Chuck, for your great detective work. You are my favorite Nuge lover.
This is a note evidently written by Ted Nugent, a famous musician. He's an outspoken activist, and I applaud him for his passion, if not his viewpoints. I am finding, more and more, that my conservative friends agree with his positions on issues, and I found myself startled this morning when I read this note.
If you've been following this blog for awhile, you might remember the backlash I recieved for supporting President Obama during his campaign. If I remember right, the quote was, "I don't know how you call yourself a Christian and vote for someone who supports abortion." And it was a long, nasty, emotional conversation...double dog dare you to go find it if you're interested. I plan to never read it again, myself.
More and more, as time goes on, and I follow the stories of the day, and the issues we struggle with as communities and as a nation, I realize that the viewpoint of the "Christian Right" and my own viewpoint as the "Christian Left," so to speak, is really far apart. And it's quite painful for me. I believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ, and try to live a life He would be proud of. And time after time I ignore comments from similar-faithed, but differently-minded people...because there seems to be no way to reconcile it. I've highlighted and commented on a few of the statements from Ted below. Some of them are apolitical or not specifically Christian, so I've ignored them. My comments are in bold.
Disclaimer: If this doesn't apply to you, then it doesn't apply to you. Please don't let my humble opinion offend you!
------------------------------------
I'm a Bad American.
This pretty much sums it up for me. I like big trucks, big boats, big houses, and naturally, pretty women.
I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some mid-level governmental functionary with a bad comb-over who wants to give it away to crack addicts squirting out babies.
I believe the money I make should be shared with those less fortunate. I believe I shouldn't discriminate my grace based on others' less fortunate situations, just like God doesn't discriminate his love for me based on my lack of worth. (Thank God!)
I don't care about appearing compassionate.
I believe that compassion is Jesus' primary instruction. Do unto others...
I think playing with toy guns doesn't make you a killer. I believe ignoring your kids and giving them Prozac might.
I think I'm doing better than the homeless.
I think I'm no better than the homeless.
I don't think being a minority makes you noble or victimized.
I think being a minority makes you victimized if you are treated unfairly in the workplace, or by the government, or by the people of this country.
I have the right not to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird or make me mad.
I must always be tolerant.
This is my life to live, and not necessarily up to others expectations.
This is my life to live. However, my legacy will be something I leave behind, and I hope that I make a difference...at least for a moment in time. The only expectation I care about is my Father in Heaven.
I know what sex is and there are not varying degrees of it.
I don't celebrate Kwanzaa. But if you want to that's fine; I just don't feel like everyone else should have to.
I believe that if you are selling me a Dairy Queen shake, a pack of cigarettes, or hotel room you do it in English. As of matter of fact, if you are an American citizen you should speak English. My Uncles and Forefathers shouldn't have had to die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born in to come disrespect ours, and make us bend to your will. Get over it.
I believe that it is easier for a country to run on a single language, but I certainly don't hold it against someone if they don't know English. Maybe we should come up with a solution to this problem instead of feeling so angry about it.
I think cops have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you're running from them after they tell you to stop. If you can't understand the word 'freeze' or 'stop' in English, see the previous line.
I don't use the excuse "it's for the children" as a shield for unpopular opinions or actions.
We make decisions every day based on the country we will leave to the next generation(s). Perhaps you have to be a parent to fully understand this, but I want to leave a healthy, safe world for my boy. I feel very strongly about this.
I know how to count votes and I feel much safer letting a machine with no political affiliation do a recount when needed.
I know what the definition of lying is, and it isn't based on the word "is"-ever.
I don't understand this...?
I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you qualify for any special loan programs, gov't sponsored bank loans, etc., so you can open a hotel, 7-Eleven, trinket shop, or any thing else, while the indigenous peoples can't get past a high school education because they can't afford it.
Small businesses keep this country running. If you're capable of adding to this economy, more power to you! (See my comments on tolerance).
I didn't take the initiative in inventing the Internet.
I thought the Taco Bell dog was funny.
I want them to bring back safe and sane fireworks.
I believe no one ever died because of something Ozzy Osbourne, Ice-T or Marilyn Manson sang, but that doesn't mean I want to listen to that crap from someone else's car when I'm stopped at a red light. But I respect your right to.
I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster or Jack In The Box.
Equals, all.
I don't want to eat or drink anything with the words light, lite or fat-free on the package.
The one statement I completely agree with. :)
Our soldiers did not go to some foreign country and risk their lives in vain and defend our Constitution so that decades later you can tell me it's a living document ever changing and is open to interpretation. The guys who wrote it were light years ahead of anyone today, and they meant what they said -- now leave the document alone, or there's going to be trouble.
Interesting. I've been making the point lately that the "right to bear arms," doesn't mean the same thing today as it did when the Constitution was written. In those days, we had no standing army. There were militias, and men could be called at any time to go fight. So our founding fathers wrote in that they had the right to bear arms in their homes. That amendment still stands, of course, but we've certainly changed the meaning. All documents are living and breathing. If this weren't, we'd still have slavery and women wouldn't have the right to vote.
I don't hate the rich.
Of course you don't, Ted, you're one of them.
I help the poor.
The other statement I agree with. Now just throw "crack-addicts spitting out babies," into it, and you're on to something.
I know wrestling is fake.
I've never owned, or was a slave, and a large percentage of our forefathers weren't wealthy enough to own one either. Please stop blaming me because some prior white people were idiots -- and remember, tons of white, Indian, Chinese, and other races have been enslaved too -- it was wrong for every one of them.
I believe a self-righteous liberal Democrat with a cause is more dangerous than a Hell's Angel with an attitude.
There's a vast difference between 'self-righteous' and 'righteous.' I actually just remembered a blog post I'd been planning on this for a long time.
I want to know exactly which church is it where the "Reverend" Jessie Jackson preaches; and, what exactly is his job function.
For what purpose? He's a strong advocate for many people, and that should be good enough.
I own a gun, you can own a gun, and any red blooded American should be allowed to own a gun, but if you use it in a crime, then you will serve the time.
I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it makes you mad, then invent the next operating system that's better and put your name on the building. Ask your buddy that invented the Internet to help you.
I don't believe in hate crime legislation. Even suggesting it makes me mad. You're telling me that someone who is a minority, gay, disabled, another nationality, or otherwise different from the mainstream of this country has more value as a human being that I do as a white male. If someone kills anyone, I'd say that it's a hate crime.
Let's say a man walks in and shoots his wife because he finds her in bed with another man. He should pay for that crime under the law, certainly. Perhaps its a crime of passion and he gets ten or twenty years, because the crime was isolated, and he's not likely to shoot another person. However, if a man shoots a gay person, simply because he or she is gay, he should go away for the rest of his life, because his crime is focused on a group of people and that entire group will always be at risk. He's much more likely to kill again, based on the type of crime. This is why we have different degrees of murder, and why it's extremely important to have hate crime legislation.
We don't need more laws! Let's enforce the ones we already have.
How about both? Is that an option?
I think turkey bacon, turkey beef, turkey fake anything sucks.
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child-it takes a parent with the guts to stand up to the kid and spank his butt and say "NO!" when it's necessary to do so.
I'll admit that the only movie that ever made me cry was Ole Yeller.
I didn't realize Dr. Seuss was a genius until I had a kid.
I will not be frowned upon or be looked down upon or be made to keep silent because I have these beliefs and opinions. I thought this country allowed me that right. I will not conform or compromise just to keep from hurting somebody's feelings. I'm neither angry nor disenfranchised, no matter how desperately the mainstream media would like the world to believe otherwise.
Neither will I, Ted. Neither will I. Carry on.
Yes, I guess by some people's definition, I may be a bad American. But that's tough.
---------------------------------------------------
We're not either good or bad. We're all both. But we need to work together to get through some of these issues. And it's going to be a lot easier if we're tolerant and loving, regardless of our religious affiliation. It's going to be a lot easier if we're looking out for each other and our fellow man, and yes, our children. I will continue to work through my own personal struggles. It's been a confusing couple years for me spiritually, but I have no doubt that God will lead me where I'm meant to go. And I have no doubt that as I achieve clarity, I will also use it to my best purpose. In the meantime, I'm sure, I'll keep talking about it!
If you've been following this blog for awhile, you might remember the backlash I recieved for supporting President Obama during his campaign. If I remember right, the quote was, "I don't know how you call yourself a Christian and vote for someone who supports abortion." And it was a long, nasty, emotional conversation...double dog dare you to go find it if you're interested. I plan to never read it again, myself.
More and more, as time goes on, and I follow the stories of the day, and the issues we struggle with as communities and as a nation, I realize that the viewpoint of the "Christian Right" and my own viewpoint as the "Christian Left," so to speak, is really far apart. And it's quite painful for me. I believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ, and try to live a life He would be proud of. And time after time I ignore comments from similar-faithed, but differently-minded people...because there seems to be no way to reconcile it. I've highlighted and commented on a few of the statements from Ted below. Some of them are apolitical or not specifically Christian, so I've ignored them. My comments are in bold.
Disclaimer: If this doesn't apply to you, then it doesn't apply to you. Please don't let my humble opinion offend you!
------------------------------------
I'm a Bad American.
This pretty much sums it up for me. I like big trucks, big boats, big houses, and naturally, pretty women.
I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some mid-level governmental functionary with a bad comb-over who wants to give it away to crack addicts squirting out babies.
I believe the money I make should be shared with those less fortunate. I believe I shouldn't discriminate my grace based on others' less fortunate situations, just like God doesn't discriminate his love for me based on my lack of worth. (Thank God!)
I don't care about appearing compassionate.
I believe that compassion is Jesus' primary instruction. Do unto others...
I think playing with toy guns doesn't make you a killer. I believe ignoring your kids and giving them Prozac might.
I think I'm doing better than the homeless.
I think I'm no better than the homeless.
I don't think being a minority makes you noble or victimized.
I think being a minority makes you victimized if you are treated unfairly in the workplace, or by the government, or by the people of this country.
I have the right not to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird or make me mad.
I must always be tolerant.
This is my life to live, and not necessarily up to others expectations.
This is my life to live. However, my legacy will be something I leave behind, and I hope that I make a difference...at least for a moment in time. The only expectation I care about is my Father in Heaven.
I know what sex is and there are not varying degrees of it.
I don't celebrate Kwanzaa. But if you want to that's fine; I just don't feel like everyone else should have to.
I believe that if you are selling me a Dairy Queen shake, a pack of cigarettes, or hotel room you do it in English. As of matter of fact, if you are an American citizen you should speak English. My Uncles and Forefathers shouldn't have had to die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born in to come disrespect ours, and make us bend to your will. Get over it.
I believe that it is easier for a country to run on a single language, but I certainly don't hold it against someone if they don't know English. Maybe we should come up with a solution to this problem instead of feeling so angry about it.
I think cops have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you're running from them after they tell you to stop. If you can't understand the word 'freeze' or 'stop' in English, see the previous line.
I don't use the excuse "it's for the children" as a shield for unpopular opinions or actions.
We make decisions every day based on the country we will leave to the next generation(s). Perhaps you have to be a parent to fully understand this, but I want to leave a healthy, safe world for my boy. I feel very strongly about this.
I know how to count votes and I feel much safer letting a machine with no political affiliation do a recount when needed.
I know what the definition of lying is, and it isn't based on the word "is"-ever.
I don't understand this...?
I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you qualify for any special loan programs, gov't sponsored bank loans, etc., so you can open a hotel, 7-Eleven, trinket shop, or any thing else, while the indigenous peoples can't get past a high school education because they can't afford it.
Small businesses keep this country running. If you're capable of adding to this economy, more power to you! (See my comments on tolerance).
I didn't take the initiative in inventing the Internet.
I thought the Taco Bell dog was funny.
I want them to bring back safe and sane fireworks.
I believe no one ever died because of something Ozzy Osbourne, Ice-T or Marilyn Manson sang, but that doesn't mean I want to listen to that crap from someone else's car when I'm stopped at a red light. But I respect your right to.
I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster or Jack In The Box.
Equals, all.
I don't want to eat or drink anything with the words light, lite or fat-free on the package.
The one statement I completely agree with. :)
Our soldiers did not go to some foreign country and risk their lives in vain and defend our Constitution so that decades later you can tell me it's a living document ever changing and is open to interpretation. The guys who wrote it were light years ahead of anyone today, and they meant what they said -- now leave the document alone, or there's going to be trouble.
Interesting. I've been making the point lately that the "right to bear arms," doesn't mean the same thing today as it did when the Constitution was written. In those days, we had no standing army. There were militias, and men could be called at any time to go fight. So our founding fathers wrote in that they had the right to bear arms in their homes. That amendment still stands, of course, but we've certainly changed the meaning. All documents are living and breathing. If this weren't, we'd still have slavery and women wouldn't have the right to vote.
I don't hate the rich.
Of course you don't, Ted, you're one of them.
I help the poor.
The other statement I agree with. Now just throw "crack-addicts spitting out babies," into it, and you're on to something.
I know wrestling is fake.
I've never owned, or was a slave, and a large percentage of our forefathers weren't wealthy enough to own one either. Please stop blaming me because some prior white people were idiots -- and remember, tons of white, Indian, Chinese, and other races have been enslaved too -- it was wrong for every one of them.
I believe a self-righteous liberal Democrat with a cause is more dangerous than a Hell's Angel with an attitude.
There's a vast difference between 'self-righteous' and 'righteous.' I actually just remembered a blog post I'd been planning on this for a long time.
I want to know exactly which church is it where the "Reverend" Jessie Jackson preaches; and, what exactly is his job function.
For what purpose? He's a strong advocate for many people, and that should be good enough.
I own a gun, you can own a gun, and any red blooded American should be allowed to own a gun, but if you use it in a crime, then you will serve the time.
I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it makes you mad, then invent the next operating system that's better and put your name on the building. Ask your buddy that invented the Internet to help you.
I don't believe in hate crime legislation. Even suggesting it makes me mad. You're telling me that someone who is a minority, gay, disabled, another nationality, or otherwise different from the mainstream of this country has more value as a human being that I do as a white male. If someone kills anyone, I'd say that it's a hate crime.
Let's say a man walks in and shoots his wife because he finds her in bed with another man. He should pay for that crime under the law, certainly. Perhaps its a crime of passion and he gets ten or twenty years, because the crime was isolated, and he's not likely to shoot another person. However, if a man shoots a gay person, simply because he or she is gay, he should go away for the rest of his life, because his crime is focused on a group of people and that entire group will always be at risk. He's much more likely to kill again, based on the type of crime. This is why we have different degrees of murder, and why it's extremely important to have hate crime legislation.
We don't need more laws! Let's enforce the ones we already have.
How about both? Is that an option?
I think turkey bacon, turkey beef, turkey fake anything sucks.
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child-it takes a parent with the guts to stand up to the kid and spank his butt and say "NO!" when it's necessary to do so.
I'll admit that the only movie that ever made me cry was Ole Yeller.
I didn't realize Dr. Seuss was a genius until I had a kid.
I will not be frowned upon or be looked down upon or be made to keep silent because I have these beliefs and opinions. I thought this country allowed me that right. I will not conform or compromise just to keep from hurting somebody's feelings. I'm neither angry nor disenfranchised, no matter how desperately the mainstream media would like the world to believe otherwise.
Neither will I, Ted. Neither will I. Carry on.
Yes, I guess by some people's definition, I may be a bad American. But that's tough.
---------------------------------------------------
We're not either good or bad. We're all both. But we need to work together to get through some of these issues. And it's going to be a lot easier if we're tolerant and loving, regardless of our religious affiliation. It's going to be a lot easier if we're looking out for each other and our fellow man, and yes, our children. I will continue to work through my own personal struggles. It's been a confusing couple years for me spiritually, but I have no doubt that God will lead me where I'm meant to go. And I have no doubt that as I achieve clarity, I will also use it to my best purpose. In the meantime, I'm sure, I'll keep talking about it!
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Tucson Tragedy
I have to talk about this. If you don't appreciate my political opinions, and you think this might put a bad taste in your mouth, close this window and move on to something else. This is too important to ignore.
Last weekend, Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford (a Democrat from Arizona) was hosting a public town-hall event at a grocery store in Tucson. A young man named Jared Lee Loughner shot her point blank in the back of her head with a semi-automatic weapon. In the process, he also killed six people and injured 13 others. One of the victims was nine-year-old Christina Taylor Green. She was born on September 11, 2001 and was part of the Faces of Hope: Babies Born on 9/11 project.
We MUST talk about this senseless act of violence. It was clearly politically motivated. We don't know if Loughner was motivated by any particular politician or commentator, and we might never know. But it doesn't change the fact that the rhetoric in this county is out of control. That it wouldn't hurt a single one of us to dial back a bit and make sure we always communicate in a respectful manner.
With power, comes responsiblity.
I listen to the radio talk show host Ed Schultz regularly. He is very progressive, and very loud. And sometimes he's kind of arrogant, but I think he's spot-on with the issues of the day. Yesterday, when I tuned in to hear him, his message was basically this (paraphrased, of course): He said that everyone with a microphone has a responsibility, himself included. He said that he spent a big part of the weekend in self-reflection. He acknowledged that he's a partisan commentator, and has crossed the line in the past, and said that it was a good opportunity for him to consider how he relays his message.
Brilliant. Thank you, Ed. It's exactly what I wanted to hear from you. In light of such tragedy, some humility.
I'm not playing the Blame Game. It's not that I'm not interested. It's not that I don't care. It's just that there is no evidence. But every politician and commentator, in this world of communication and transparency, should take this opportunity to check themselves. It would be great to hear more apologies. In the future, I will expect more. If there is a chance that rhetoric could lead to actual violence, then it would be a good idea to withhold the angry, hateful speech, lest someone consider it a call to action and more people get hurt.
Christina Taylor Green's entry in Faces of Hope, reads: "I hope you know all the words to the Star Spangled Banner and sing it with your hand over your heart. I hope you jump in rain puddles."
May her legacy change the world.
Last weekend, Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford (a Democrat from Arizona) was hosting a public town-hall event at a grocery store in Tucson. A young man named Jared Lee Loughner shot her point blank in the back of her head with a semi-automatic weapon. In the process, he also killed six people and injured 13 others. One of the victims was nine-year-old Christina Taylor Green. She was born on September 11, 2001 and was part of the Faces of Hope: Babies Born on 9/11 project.
We MUST talk about this senseless act of violence. It was clearly politically motivated. We don't know if Loughner was motivated by any particular politician or commentator, and we might never know. But it doesn't change the fact that the rhetoric in this county is out of control. That it wouldn't hurt a single one of us to dial back a bit and make sure we always communicate in a respectful manner.
With power, comes responsiblity.
I listen to the radio talk show host Ed Schultz regularly. He is very progressive, and very loud. And sometimes he's kind of arrogant, but I think he's spot-on with the issues of the day. Yesterday, when I tuned in to hear him, his message was basically this (paraphrased, of course): He said that everyone with a microphone has a responsibility, himself included. He said that he spent a big part of the weekend in self-reflection. He acknowledged that he's a partisan commentator, and has crossed the line in the past, and said that it was a good opportunity for him to consider how he relays his message.
Brilliant. Thank you, Ed. It's exactly what I wanted to hear from you. In light of such tragedy, some humility.
I'm not playing the Blame Game. It's not that I'm not interested. It's not that I don't care. It's just that there is no evidence. But every politician and commentator, in this world of communication and transparency, should take this opportunity to check themselves. It would be great to hear more apologies. In the future, I will expect more. If there is a chance that rhetoric could lead to actual violence, then it would be a good idea to withhold the angry, hateful speech, lest someone consider it a call to action and more people get hurt.
Christina Taylor Green's entry in Faces of Hope, reads: "I hope you know all the words to the Star Spangled Banner and sing it with your hand over your heart. I hope you jump in rain puddles."
May her legacy change the world.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
The President
A note from my sweet overseas friend:
"Hi Leanne
So, elections-time again - go tell your friends to be proud of the President! He had REALLY hard odds, and people might be disappointed (the media tell me the Americans are disappointed), but I am convinced that no other person in that chair would have been able to do as good a job as Obama. With any other president everything would have been much worse.
That's all, happy elections :-)"
Boy, I love her. And the president.
"Hi Leanne
So, elections-time again - go tell your friends to be proud of the President! He had REALLY hard odds, and people might be disappointed (the media tell me the Americans are disappointed), but I am convinced that no other person in that chair would have been able to do as good a job as Obama. With any other president everything would have been much worse.
That's all, happy elections :-)"
Boy, I love her. And the president.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Peace.
To start out a new week -- and take a little break from the recipes -- I thought I'd post something topical. I recognize that this is a hot topic, and I know the opposing side of my argument. Feel free to post your thoughts in the comments, as always.
We've been having a bit of a conflict in the US of A. Well, we've been having a few, but this is the one I want to talk about. In case you've been living under a rock, I thought I'd inform you that there is a group of Americans who want to build a Muslim community center in Manhattan. The proposed site is near Ground Zero, and many Americans think it's disprespectful to the memory of the lives lost to build it near the place of the September 11 attacks. Truth is, there was a mosque there previously (as well Muslim religious facilities within the Twin Towers themselves).
The argument has become: does religious freedom exist in America? "Tasteful" or otherwise, the project has been deemed perfectly legal. The outcome is yet undetermined. The funds aren't even in place to actually build the community center, and the plan isn't to construct it in the immediate future. But, in my humble opinion, that's not the real issue. The issue is whether or not we're assuming that all Muslims are terrorists. It turns out that a great many Americans are making that assumption.
Then, just before September 11 of this year, a pastor in Florida by the name of Terry Jones tried to start a "holiday" called National Burn a Quran Day. Luckily, he called it off, but not before he posed as a Christian representative to the rest of the world. If the terrorists are a case of extreme Islam, then Pastor Jones is surely an example of extreme Christianity. And I feel sad about that image. I realize that most Christians don't feel the way Pastor Jones does, but with the press he received and the attention we all gave him...it validated his opinion. So loving, isn't it...burning another person's holy book? So kind, isn't it...spewing that kind of hatred for an entire group of people?
I've always maintained that one of President Obama's major accomplishments has been restoring our reputation in the world. I think he is a great diplomat, and the rest of the world listens. In the midst of the controversy, he made a statement (in part, please feel free to seek out the entire speech):
But let me be clear. As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are. The writ of the Founders must endure.
Last week, out of the blue, I got an email from a friend of mine in Denmark. She and I have recently become reacquainted and I assume she knew little of my political opinions prior to this email. When I asked her if I could post her email on my blog her response was: "Go ahead and post it, whatever it takes to change the mind of just one person ;-)"
So. Here it is. Enjoy.
"By the way, I wanted to congratulate you on your president (Obama) again! I heard parts of his speech on 9/11 - or the day before - in which he insisted that we should not fight muslims but terrorists and that if you could build a church or a synagogue, then you could build a mosque as well. I really do believe that he is doing a HUGE leap for world peace saying those things. People in the entire world listens to what he is saying, and I know that for the many Muslims in Europe, this is so important. Especially the young Muslims here, when they become teenagers they often get this "who-am-I?" feeling, because they realize they are not REALLY turks (or whereever their parents come from) and if they feel excluded from the West as well, their only identity is being fundamental, extreme Muslims. However, when Obama says those things about being equal, I think they feel welcome and included and part of the society they live in. And it is strange, that what the American president says has this effect on Europeans - but that's just the way it is :-)"
So don't take it from me. Take it from my sweet friend in Europe, who offers us another perspective and gives us something else to mull over. We are not the only citizens of the world. I think we'd do ourselves a service by looking outside of our own lives and loving everyone. And as Christians, let our light truly shine. Not only when it's painless and comfortable, but all the time. Instead of carrying around signs of protest that speak of hatred and fear, can we not reach out with love? Especially in a time when the world is fragile and people are hurting...can we not seek out peace?
"You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven." Matthew 5:15-16
We've been having a bit of a conflict in the US of A. Well, we've been having a few, but this is the one I want to talk about. In case you've been living under a rock, I thought I'd inform you that there is a group of Americans who want to build a Muslim community center in Manhattan. The proposed site is near Ground Zero, and many Americans think it's disprespectful to the memory of the lives lost to build it near the place of the September 11 attacks. Truth is, there was a mosque there previously (as well Muslim religious facilities within the Twin Towers themselves).
The argument has become: does religious freedom exist in America? "Tasteful" or otherwise, the project has been deemed perfectly legal. The outcome is yet undetermined. The funds aren't even in place to actually build the community center, and the plan isn't to construct it in the immediate future. But, in my humble opinion, that's not the real issue. The issue is whether or not we're assuming that all Muslims are terrorists. It turns out that a great many Americans are making that assumption.
Then, just before September 11 of this year, a pastor in Florida by the name of Terry Jones tried to start a "holiday" called National Burn a Quran Day. Luckily, he called it off, but not before he posed as a Christian representative to the rest of the world. If the terrorists are a case of extreme Islam, then Pastor Jones is surely an example of extreme Christianity. And I feel sad about that image. I realize that most Christians don't feel the way Pastor Jones does, but with the press he received and the attention we all gave him...it validated his opinion. So loving, isn't it...burning another person's holy book? So kind, isn't it...spewing that kind of hatred for an entire group of people?
I've always maintained that one of President Obama's major accomplishments has been restoring our reputation in the world. I think he is a great diplomat, and the rest of the world listens. In the midst of the controversy, he made a statement (in part, please feel free to seek out the entire speech):
But let me be clear. As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are. The writ of the Founders must endure.
Last week, out of the blue, I got an email from a friend of mine in Denmark. She and I have recently become reacquainted and I assume she knew little of my political opinions prior to this email. When I asked her if I could post her email on my blog her response was: "Go ahead and post it, whatever it takes to change the mind of just one person ;-)"
So. Here it is. Enjoy.
"By the way, I wanted to congratulate you on your president (Obama) again! I heard parts of his speech on 9/11 - or the day before - in which he insisted that we should not fight muslims but terrorists and that if you could build a church or a synagogue, then you could build a mosque as well. I really do believe that he is doing a HUGE leap for world peace saying those things. People in the entire world listens to what he is saying, and I know that for the many Muslims in Europe, this is so important. Especially the young Muslims here, when they become teenagers they often get this "who-am-I?" feeling, because they realize they are not REALLY turks (or whereever their parents come from) and if they feel excluded from the West as well, their only identity is being fundamental, extreme Muslims. However, when Obama says those things about being equal, I think they feel welcome and included and part of the society they live in. And it is strange, that what the American president says has this effect on Europeans - but that's just the way it is :-)"
So don't take it from me. Take it from my sweet friend in Europe, who offers us another perspective and gives us something else to mull over. We are not the only citizens of the world. I think we'd do ourselves a service by looking outside of our own lives and loving everyone. And as Christians, let our light truly shine. Not only when it's painless and comfortable, but all the time. Instead of carrying around signs of protest that speak of hatred and fear, can we not reach out with love? Especially in a time when the world is fragile and people are hurting...can we not seek out peace?
"You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven." Matthew 5:15-16
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Righto, Mr. President.
"You know, there's a lot of talk in this country about the federal deficit. But I think we should talk more about our empathy deficit -- the ability to put ourselves in someone else's shoes; to see the world through the eyes of those who are different from us -- the child who's hungry, the steelworker who's been laid-off, the family who lost the entire life they built together when the storm came to town. When you think like this -- when you choose to broaden your ambit of concern and empathize with the plight of others, whether they are close friends or distant strangers -- it becomes harder not to act; harder not to help."
- Barack Obama
Monday, March 29, 2010
Freedoms I Enjoy
I'm responding to a comment on a different blog. Believe it or not, I've been biting my tongue for the past couple weeks. But this is a point I feel very strongly is worth making: I, as an American citizen, am enjoying an enormous amount of freedoms. Here is my short list:
1. I get to worship where I choose. Whenever I choose to. So does my neighbor.
2. I can go out in my neighborhood without the fear of being injured.
3. I can send my children to school, so they can receive an education.
4. I can choose to teach my children from home, if I choose to.
5. I can have my own money.
6. I can own my own property.
7. My equal rights as a woman are protected and I can work as hard or as little as I choose.
8. I can read and write whatever I want.
9. I can have as many or as few children as I choose.
10. I can express my opinions out loud, without fear of repercussion.
Additionally, I benefit from these government (socialist) programs on a daily basis:
1. The FDIC: protects my money.
2. The FDA: makes sure that medicines are safe for my use.
3. Public Schools: my children get to go to school.
4. Public Safety: My streets are safe thanks to the police officers and firefighters that protect me.
5. Public Works: I can get from here to almost anywhere in the Twin Cities in less than half an hour, thanks to both national, state, and local public works departments.
6. Public Recreation: My children can play T-Ball and take the Red Cross Babysitting course through our local communities.
7. OSHA, etc: My husband stays safe on the job due to state and federal safety standards.
8. Department of Transporation: Safe traveling across the country, thanks to signs, traffic lights, bridges, crosswalks, etc.
9. Public Libraries: I get to check out books at my local library.
10. The Military and Dept of Homeland Security: No explanation necessary.
I challenge you to add to my list!
1. I get to worship where I choose. Whenever I choose to. So does my neighbor.
2. I can go out in my neighborhood without the fear of being injured.
3. I can send my children to school, so they can receive an education.
4. I can choose to teach my children from home, if I choose to.
5. I can have my own money.
6. I can own my own property.
7. My equal rights as a woman are protected and I can work as hard or as little as I choose.
8. I can read and write whatever I want.
9. I can have as many or as few children as I choose.
10. I can express my opinions out loud, without fear of repercussion.
Additionally, I benefit from these government (socialist) programs on a daily basis:
1. The FDIC: protects my money.
2. The FDA: makes sure that medicines are safe for my use.
3. Public Schools: my children get to go to school.
4. Public Safety: My streets are safe thanks to the police officers and firefighters that protect me.
5. Public Works: I can get from here to almost anywhere in the Twin Cities in less than half an hour, thanks to both national, state, and local public works departments.
6. Public Recreation: My children can play T-Ball and take the Red Cross Babysitting course through our local communities.
7. OSHA, etc: My husband stays safe on the job due to state and federal safety standards.
8. Department of Transporation: Safe traveling across the country, thanks to signs, traffic lights, bridges, crosswalks, etc.
9. Public Libraries: I get to check out books at my local library.
10. The Military and Dept of Homeland Security: No explanation necessary.
I challenge you to add to my list!
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Health Care Reform: The Final Post
The healthcare bill passed both the house and the senate and the president signed it into law this week. In it, insurance companies can no longer discriminate nor charge more for people with pre-existing conditions. You cannot be dropped if you get sick. You can stay on your parents' insurance until you're 26. In 2014, you'll have to buy insurance, but if the you cannot afford it, the government will help you subsidize it. At that time, there will also be exchanges where small businesses can pool together and purchase later group plans for their employees, thereby getting better rates and better coverage.
These are a few of the positives in this bill. I really wanted to see a public option (no surprise), so that the insurance companies would have some real competition and be forced to keep their rates reasonable.
The backlash against this bill has been overwhelming. Do you know that if you write in all caps it's the virtual equivalent of yelling? Perhaps you meant to, but man, my ears hurt.
Here are the things I've really been wanting to say. (Disclaimer: When I use "you," it's not directed at anyone in particular. And it's not directed at all the opposers of the bill. I have many intelligent, informed friends with legitimate arguments against health care reform. I have had a few very civil conversations with those friends this week that helped me understand parts of the other side of the argument. This is directed at those who are angry, but haven't read the bill. Who are angry, but are misinformed. I am sorry if I offend anyone. My intention is to get it out of my head. And to finalize the many posts I've had this year about this subject.)
1. I get it, you're upset. You don't agree philosophically with this bill, and you're angry about it passing. I even know all of your arguments (too much government, how will our health care system support all these new patients, costs too much money, health care insurance isn't a right, it's a privilege, etc.). Then get involved. I spent a lot of time this past year learning, and listening, and acting. I am a little bit in love with democracy, because we really do get to make our voice heard. Don't just complain; DO something.
2. It passed. Do not say, "Shame on you, government, for not listening to the people." My government listened to me. And to millions of other Americans who were ready for health care reform. Millions of Americans voted for Obama, and he campaigned largely on this platform. We knew when we voted that he was going to work for this change. I think it's unfair to say that the government didn't work for the people. There are millions of Americans who are going to be healthier because of this bill. Many Americans will now be able to avoid financial ruin because of this bill. Their government listened to them.
3. I do not understand the "government takeover" argument. I don't. We don't have a single-payer system. There isn't even a public option. There is some regulation of the government over an industry that could care less about the welfare of human beings. In my humble opinion, it's the government's job to protect us from sharks, and for this regulation I am thankful.
4. I do NOT understand the violence. I read this op-ed earlier this week and I wanted to throw up. The amount of fear and anger I've been surrounded by this week is overwhelming. For people to scream at a man with Parkinson's disease at a Tea Party rally last weekend, and protestors screaming slurs at US Congresspeople as they went to vote. As of today, ten Democrats have reported threats and violence at their offices. Broken windows, threatening messages. Out. of. control.
You don't need me to reiterate how I feel about violence of this sort. I've done enough posts on fear and how it affects us (and I've now labeled all my posts, so if you want to know how I feel about it, it's easy to find).
I'm going to be done talking about it now. It started as a hypothetical and went through the process. It was a serious debate, and there was a vote. It's the law now. I am hoping that as things settle down and all of the details become available, people will be more comfortable.
For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger, and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison, and you came to visit me.
Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirst and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?
The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'
Matthew 25:35-40
Peace and love.
These are a few of the positives in this bill. I really wanted to see a public option (no surprise), so that the insurance companies would have some real competition and be forced to keep their rates reasonable.
The backlash against this bill has been overwhelming. Do you know that if you write in all caps it's the virtual equivalent of yelling? Perhaps you meant to, but man, my ears hurt.
Here are the things I've really been wanting to say. (Disclaimer: When I use "you," it's not directed at anyone in particular. And it's not directed at all the opposers of the bill. I have many intelligent, informed friends with legitimate arguments against health care reform. I have had a few very civil conversations with those friends this week that helped me understand parts of the other side of the argument. This is directed at those who are angry, but haven't read the bill. Who are angry, but are misinformed. I am sorry if I offend anyone. My intention is to get it out of my head. And to finalize the many posts I've had this year about this subject.)
1. I get it, you're upset. You don't agree philosophically with this bill, and you're angry about it passing. I even know all of your arguments (too much government, how will our health care system support all these new patients, costs too much money, health care insurance isn't a right, it's a privilege, etc.). Then get involved. I spent a lot of time this past year learning, and listening, and acting. I am a little bit in love with democracy, because we really do get to make our voice heard. Don't just complain; DO something.
2. It passed. Do not say, "Shame on you, government, for not listening to the people." My government listened to me. And to millions of other Americans who were ready for health care reform. Millions of Americans voted for Obama, and he campaigned largely on this platform. We knew when we voted that he was going to work for this change. I think it's unfair to say that the government didn't work for the people. There are millions of Americans who are going to be healthier because of this bill. Many Americans will now be able to avoid financial ruin because of this bill. Their government listened to them.
3. I do not understand the "government takeover" argument. I don't. We don't have a single-payer system. There isn't even a public option. There is some regulation of the government over an industry that could care less about the welfare of human beings. In my humble opinion, it's the government's job to protect us from sharks, and for this regulation I am thankful.
4. I do NOT understand the violence. I read this op-ed earlier this week and I wanted to throw up. The amount of fear and anger I've been surrounded by this week is overwhelming. For people to scream at a man with Parkinson's disease at a Tea Party rally last weekend, and protestors screaming slurs at US Congresspeople as they went to vote. As of today, ten Democrats have reported threats and violence at their offices. Broken windows, threatening messages. Out. of. control.
You don't need me to reiterate how I feel about violence of this sort. I've done enough posts on fear and how it affects us (and I've now labeled all my posts, so if you want to know how I feel about it, it's easy to find).
I'm going to be done talking about it now. It started as a hypothetical and went through the process. It was a serious debate, and there was a vote. It's the law now. I am hoping that as things settle down and all of the details become available, people will be more comfortable.
For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger, and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison, and you came to visit me.
Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirst and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?
The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'
Matthew 25:35-40
Peace and love.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Spring
(I am going to comment on the passed health care reform bill. But not yet. I gotta let some of it die down and process my response to it all. There is a lot to comment on. And since this blog is, in addition to my random public thoughts, a record of my life that I'll have forever, I want to get it right.)
It's officially Spring here. These photos prove it. And if you need further proof, you can call me or stop over and listen to me sneeze and sneeze. My sinuses are already upset.)
It's officially Spring here. These photos prove it. And if you need further proof, you can call me or stop over and listen to me sneeze and sneeze. My sinuses are already upset.)
That puffy stuff is that tree budding. He's an early riser.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Health Care Reform, The Finish Line
Sounds like there'll be a vote on the health care reform bill this Sunday. I, for one, am ready. My viewpoint has not wavered from the very beginning of this discussion, well over a year ago. Philosophically, I know that passing this bill (while it's far from the reform I was hoping for) is the right thing to do. I am not proud of the fact that we call ourselves the greatest nation in the world, and we let our citizens suffer and die. Yeah, I know. A lot of you don't agree. And at this point, I'm just going to have to be okay with that.
This morning, I stumbled across this list of biblical references about helping others. I have no other argument at this time.
I have called my representatives. I have emailed them. I have talked (and talked and talked) to my friends about it. I really love democracy. When we have an issue, or an opinion, we can get involved. For that, I am grateful.
Whatever happens from here, I made my voice heard.
This morning, I stumbled across this list of biblical references about helping others. I have no other argument at this time.
I have called my representatives. I have emailed them. I have talked (and talked and talked) to my friends about it. I really love democracy. When we have an issue, or an opinion, we can get involved. For that, I am grateful.
Whatever happens from here, I made my voice heard.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Check Yo'self.
I have been wrestling with myself the past couple weeks. Like, a lot. And I appreciate this exercise, because I know I'm going to learn something, but man, it's so painful! Nothing worse than looking at the insides of your own character flaw.
Here's the thing: do I have to share every thought, every concern with the entire world? Are my thoughts and viewpoints so important that it's worth hurting someone's feelings?
I lost a facebook friend. Sometime between January 2009 and March 2010. She's not someone I have a lot of contact with now, so I didn't notice when she deleted me. But we used to be good friends. She is hilarious and kind and I loved her then. And I'm 99.5% sure I know why she deleted me; she doesn't see the world the same way I see it (ie she's conservative; I'm liberal). And you know what? That was the right thing to do...delete me. If I don't make you happy, or add something to your life, there is no purpose being my friend. Absolutely. But it still stung, because I know that I offended her.
I'm not delusional. I'd be willing to bet that a large percentage of my Facebook friends have me hidden in their newsfeed. And I have no problem with that...I have a few hidden as well. We wouldn't sit around in real life and listen to the opinions of others who are opposite of ours, and there's no reason to do it virtually, either. C'est la vie.
On a discussion on another friend's wall this week, I told someone to "check themselves." And it made me think that this might be a good time to check *myself.* So I spent a few days really exploring it. Talking to a couple people that I really trust, and spending time praying about it. My prayer always consists of, "Let me do Your work." I want to make sure that I'm only spending time on things that really matter, things that matter to humanity. I want to make sure that my ego doesn't get in the way. So that when I lose a friend (it'll happen again!), I'll know that it didn't happen because I stopped respecting other opinions or that my pride got in the way.
I sent a text to a mutual friend once I realized she had deleted me. I said to her that "maybe I should keep my bloody mouth shut once in awhile". She said, "Well either stop talking about things you find important and just agree with everyone all the time or keep putting urself out there, yes youll get knocked around but at least ur you!" Thank you, sweet friend. I really needed that.
It's complicated, exposing ourselves. For what reason do I find the need to share everything? I hope the answer is: because it helps more people than it hurts. And when it doesn't, I pray that I have the grace to shut my bloody mouth.
Have a great week!
Here's the thing: do I have to share every thought, every concern with the entire world? Are my thoughts and viewpoints so important that it's worth hurting someone's feelings?
I lost a facebook friend. Sometime between January 2009 and March 2010. She's not someone I have a lot of contact with now, so I didn't notice when she deleted me. But we used to be good friends. She is hilarious and kind and I loved her then. And I'm 99.5% sure I know why she deleted me; she doesn't see the world the same way I see it (ie she's conservative; I'm liberal). And you know what? That was the right thing to do...delete me. If I don't make you happy, or add something to your life, there is no purpose being my friend. Absolutely. But it still stung, because I know that I offended her.
I'm not delusional. I'd be willing to bet that a large percentage of my Facebook friends have me hidden in their newsfeed. And I have no problem with that...I have a few hidden as well. We wouldn't sit around in real life and listen to the opinions of others who are opposite of ours, and there's no reason to do it virtually, either. C'est la vie.
On a discussion on another friend's wall this week, I told someone to "check themselves." And it made me think that this might be a good time to check *myself.* So I spent a few days really exploring it. Talking to a couple people that I really trust, and spending time praying about it. My prayer always consists of, "Let me do Your work." I want to make sure that I'm only spending time on things that really matter, things that matter to humanity. I want to make sure that my ego doesn't get in the way. So that when I lose a friend (it'll happen again!), I'll know that it didn't happen because I stopped respecting other opinions or that my pride got in the way.
I sent a text to a mutual friend once I realized she had deleted me. I said to her that "maybe I should keep my bloody mouth shut once in awhile". She said, "Well either stop talking about things you find important and just agree with everyone all the time or keep putting urself out there, yes youll get knocked around but at least ur you!" Thank you, sweet friend. I really needed that.
It's complicated, exposing ourselves. For what reason do I find the need to share everything? I hope the answer is: because it helps more people than it hurts. And when it doesn't, I pray that I have the grace to shut my bloody mouth.
Have a great week!
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
The Spiritual Series: Part V
Fear and Hatred
How does it play into your life and your value system?
I have been really really struggling with this issue the past few months, and I need to get some of it out. I hope you'll bear with me through my thoughts and then I welcome yours as well. I genuinely mean no offense, I just want to discuss this.
Everyone knows I'm a progressive. I listen to progressive and liberal talk show hosts. I believe their set of opinions are not the only valid ones, but I maintain that they more loving. There are so many talk show hosts in this country who speak of hatred. And fear. Who are vile and angry, and who, in my opinion, incite actual violence.
I was going to post the quotes here, but I can't. I urge you to read them for yourselves. And then, I ask you, how do your political values and whether or not you agree with these viewpoints align with your spirituality and/or religion?
Rush Limbaugh
Glenn Beck
I found them because they are the most widely-listened to talk show hosts. They have millions of followers who believe everything they say. Oh, but the fear!
Are we not called upon to be unafraid? To love everyone?
Finally, all of you, live in harmony with one another; be sympathetic, love as brothers, be compassionate and humble. Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult, but with blessing, because to this you were called so that you may inherit a blessing. For, "Whoever would love life and see good days must keep his tongue from evil and his lips from deceitful speech. He must turn from evil and do good; he must seek peace and pursue it. For the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous and his ears are attentive to their prayer, but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil."
Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good? But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. "Do not fear what they fear; do not be frightened." But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.
I Peter 3: 8-16
I guess this is my lesson. This is what I have to remind myself of: I can't convince anyone else, and I have to learn that it's okay if I don't. I need to learn to keep praying for those who don't have peace. I must love them too...
I am an idealist*, and I like to envision a world without hatred. What would that look like? Heaven, I assume! Some days I get lost in that daydream. And sometimes, I just try to make sense of the world we have...
*another post for another day!
How does it play into your life and your value system?
I have been really really struggling with this issue the past few months, and I need to get some of it out. I hope you'll bear with me through my thoughts and then I welcome yours as well. I genuinely mean no offense, I just want to discuss this.
Everyone knows I'm a progressive. I listen to progressive and liberal talk show hosts. I believe their set of opinions are not the only valid ones, but I maintain that they more loving. There are so many talk show hosts in this country who speak of hatred. And fear. Who are vile and angry, and who, in my opinion, incite actual violence.
I was going to post the quotes here, but I can't. I urge you to read them for yourselves. And then, I ask you, how do your political values and whether or not you agree with these viewpoints align with your spirituality and/or religion?
Rush Limbaugh
Glenn Beck
I found them because they are the most widely-listened to talk show hosts. They have millions of followers who believe everything they say. Oh, but the fear!
Are we not called upon to be unafraid? To love everyone?
Finally, all of you, live in harmony with one another; be sympathetic, love as brothers, be compassionate and humble. Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult, but with blessing, because to this you were called so that you may inherit a blessing. For, "Whoever would love life and see good days must keep his tongue from evil and his lips from deceitful speech. He must turn from evil and do good; he must seek peace and pursue it. For the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous and his ears are attentive to their prayer, but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil."
Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good? But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. "Do not fear what they fear; do not be frightened." But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.
I Peter 3: 8-16
I guess this is my lesson. This is what I have to remind myself of: I can't convince anyone else, and I have to learn that it's okay if I don't. I need to learn to keep praying for those who don't have peace. I must love them too...
I am an idealist*, and I like to envision a world without hatred. What would that look like? Heaven, I assume! Some days I get lost in that daydream. And sometimes, I just try to make sense of the world we have...
*another post for another day!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
